Subject: AH Challenge: Inverted Countries; China and India Date: 13 Aug 2001 13:28:05 -0700 From: hartjos@iit.edu (Fleetlord Hart) Organization: http://groups.google.com/ Newsgroups: soc.history.what-if With a POD after, say, 1750, have 21st century China as a developing former British colony with a democratic form of government, and a communist India (inc. Pakistan and Bangladesh) seen as future superpower material by some. Both nations are still nuclear armed. Bonus points if the world has an independent nuclear armed Sinkaing (Pakistan) AND a rump democratic Indian state (Taiwan). Good luck, -Joe Hart "A litle learning is a dangerous thing, drink deep or taste not the Pierian spring. There shallow draughts intoxicate the brain, and drinking largely sobers us again." - Alexander Pope Subject: Re: AH Challenge: Inverted Countries; China and India Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2001 02:05:02 GMT From: Byzantine Organization: Excite@Home - The Leader in Broadband http://home.com/faster Newsgroups: soc.history.what-if References: 1 Hmmm… this one’s tough. But I’ll try…. POD: In 1757, the battle of Plassey goes a bit differently. Maybe the Nawab doesn’t impetuously squander his ammunition, or his generals don’t stab him in the back, or the French are more co-operative, or something else. The net result is that Plassey is a draw. The British East India Company fails to get a foothold in Bengal and therefore can’t extract massive land taxes to fund the expansion into India. And since it’s a draw, the French can’t either. Over the next couple decades, India is a patchwork of relative chaos, with French, British, Dutch and Portuguese vying for external control, while the more progressive Indian kings with more extensive European contact rapidly build modern defense industries based on cannon and musket. No one can get in, but each keeps the other out. All the while there is a continuous exchange of ideas. In 1782, Britain is reeling from the exorbitant costs of fighting in the American colonies; in this timeline, there are the reduced profits of a delayed industrial revolution (less capital from Indian land taxes) and far less asymmetric trade with distant colonies. Unwilling to countenance propping up the BEIC in India, Britain turns its back on the Company after its defeat at the hands of Tipu Sultan in Mysore. They settle, instead for taking Ceylon from the Dutch and running plantations. Over the years they also manage to get the southern Malay peninsula and Java, providing a future British gateway to China. The French Revolution in 1789 abruptly curtails French colonial ambitions in India. Tipu Sultan gathers a coalition of like-minded co-belligerent rulers in south and east India, vowing to maintain sovereignty against the remaining “foreign devils”. To speed the necessary industrialization, they agree to a currency union amongst their separate states. To facilitate communication, they agree to adopt a “Modern Sanskrit” as a link/courtly language between the member states, which together form the Confederate States of India (CSI). The rather limited federal government is also in charge of foreign policy, war, the collection of customs revenue, and the maintenance of a standing army. Loosely paraphrasing the Mahabharata, the new constitution states “Separately, we were like easily broken fingers; together, we form a powerful fist.” Meanwhile, British expansion continues eastward, by-passing India. Though the Dutch are left to their devices in OTL Indonesia (minus Java) the British sail up the coast into China. There they meet the Qing dynasty in a state of decline. Using the process of divide and rule, they manage to acquire hegemony over a good chunk of the Chinese heartland by 1850. The Japanese pull a weaker Meiji restoration a bit early, and are able to beat off British and American incursions, but can’t do much more at this time. In South Asia, meanwhile, the last bits of the carcass of the Mughal Empire have fallen to the CSI (1857), which has steadily adopted the best of the European and Indian institutions. An army staffed and run by Indians organized along Prussian-lines, funded by a British-style national bank, with Swiss-quality arms, steamrollers the rest of South Asia, stretching to the borders of OTL Persia, Tibet, and Thailand, by 1914. Industrialization, led by capitalists from Bengal and Madras, proceeds rapidly. The first trans-CSI railroad opens in 1870. By 1914, on the eve of the Great European War, India’s per capita wealth (including newly incorporated regions) is only 25% that of Germany but catching up fast. Exultant with their heady success after the destruction of the Moghuls in the 1850s, the CSI undertakes an ambitious national project, partly inspired by the Japanese example – they will form a much closer union, adopt a national religion and have a single language. With the currency union having led the way in economic integration, a common army, and the link language of “Modern Sanskrit” as a precedent, the CSI government adopts a militant, monotheistic Kshatriya-ized Hinduism, with elements taken from Sufi Islam (think reformist Sikhs on steroids worshipping the one true God, chanting His Sacred name ‘Om’). The institution of state-run schools speeds this process so that by 1939, other languages and religions are fading fast. State-run persecution speeds this process. Refugee orthodox Hindus who cannot stomach the incredibly rapid de facto abolition of the caste system in a rapidly urbanizing country, and fundamentalist Muslims who cry heresy at the changing pattern of social interaction and the slow erosion of institutions such as purdah, flee to other parts of the world, forming an extensive diaspora. Muslims choose Ottoman and British SW Asia, where they distinguish themselves overseeing construction of the Qattara Depression Scheme in 1910. Hindus prefer East and South Africa, where they grow to surpass whites in population and eventually dominate the cut diamond trade and the commercial sector; Ceylon is popular with both groups. During the abortive Boer rebellion, the heavily outnumbered Afrikaners curse the ‘curry-eating’ ortho-Hindu British troops. In 1938, Hitler’s invasion of Poland sparks the Eurasian War. With the running sore of Ceylon, swayed by Hilterian arguments about ‘Aryan brotherhood’, and admiring the example of Japan (who have governed the Philippines since the late 1890s), India joins the Axis, hoping for quick territorial gains against Ceylon and the mountainous country of Afghanistan and Tibet. Though Ceylon is easily taken (thanks to the spectacular work of the engineer-jawans who construct the Palk bridge in record time using pre-fab construction techniques), Tibet and Afghanistan prove much harder, especially with lots of American lend-lease aid flowing through Soviet Manchuria on its way to Afghani nationalists and Tibetan fighters. India remains stuck in this position as first Germany falls in 1946 and Japan in 1947. However, India has been bled – and caught off guard in what for India has been primarily an anti-guerilla war. The destruction of Osaka and Yokohama by nuclear fire strikes terror into the CSI government. Though it plays for time, the nuclear bombing of Madras by a long-range British Vindicator bomber based in Oman forces the CSI government to the negotiating table. They agree to put Ceylon under joint Allied control, and grudgingly agree to give up Tibet, which will join with Sinkiang to form the “Central Asian Republic” (CAR). Citing “historical continuity” with Afghanistan, the spread of the new faith over the previous decades (and backed up by the previous ethnic cleansing of those who failed to submit to “Modern Hinduism”), the CSI retains control of Afghanistan in a remarkable show of generosity by the Americans, spurred on by the utopian post-war plans of General Marshall. However, confusion over the actual border between CAR and China mars any residual good will. Simultaneously, the Japanese withdraw from the Chinese possessions that they had taken during the course of the war. Japan is to be a parliamentary democracy, as will be the various Chinese states, merged into one ramshackle federal state, each with mutually unintelligible dialects (thanks to the adoption of the Latin alphabet to write the various Chinese languages [as in OTL Vietnam], to increase the ease of learning them by British colonialists and administrators and to increase literacy rates in badly underfunded colonial grammar schools). Humiliation by the foreign devils, however, causes chaos in India. Drawing upon the rantings of a semi-religious figure in OTL Nepal, the CSI falls to a “People’s Revolution”. The strength of the movement is confirmed after a “Long March” from the Karen region of Burma province to the capital in Delhi. The old aristocracy is to be replaced by “people’s cadres” who will run the country of 400 million people in a fairer manner. Women will be given the right to vote for the appointed party official. There will be free medical care for all. There will be no scraping and bowing before foreigners. And the policy of ‘from each according to his ability, to each according to his need’ will be strictly followed. While the Soviets rejoice at a ‘communist’ takeover, the People’s Republic of India (PRI) foreign minister Anil Jamshedpur retorts ‘Lenin was specific to his socio-cultural milieu . If the Soviets want to call this communism, this is communism with Indian characteristics.’ Aided by the Soviet intelligence services, India explodes its first nuclear bomb in 1955. Miraculously, the relatively underpopulated Central Asian Republic (though bolstered by hordes of migrants from India, as a result of a “reciprocal friendship agreement”) explode their first bomb in 1975, a mere year after China does the same. After the first nuclear bomb a series of spectacular failed Indian economic experiments follow, from the “greening of Baluchistan” to the “Narmada Hydroelectric Project”. Ceylon remains a sticking point, though PRI succeeds in exporting it’s firebrand communism to CAR and, with the aid of the Soviet Union, attempts (unsuccessfully) to re-export communism to anarchic China. China continues to muddle along, as insurgency along the border with Soviet Manchuria proves difficult to stamp out. The continuous threat by guerilla raiders and infiltrators from CAR, and failed efforts at Fabian socialism (inspired by the works of Thoreau and friends) fritters away economic potential. Though famines are a thing of the past in democratic China, the economy grows at an anemic “Confucian rate of growth” – barely ahead of population growth. By 1980, the standard of living in India is no better than 25 years ago, and worse by some measures, despite tremendous upheaval. Moreover, the PRI has fallen behind its geopolitical competitors. A new generation of communist leaders realizes that a second cycle of modernization is needed. Vowing that “it does not matter the shape of the mango flower, as long as it bears fruit”, PRI Secretary-General Motilal Maurya “rehabilitates” Indian capitalists festering in the prisons of the Andaman islands and puts them to work on a short leash. By 2001 India is rapidly catching up with the West. Though still heavily dependent upon oil from the CAR, royalist Persia, and the badly tottering Soviet Union, India, with its 900 million strong population, is projected to overtake the USA as the world’s largest economy by 2020. China’s progress has been much slower. However, the boom in computer technology has allowed for the English-speaking Chinese to gain a large slice of the global information technology industry, even as India has a near choke-hold on light manufacturing. The abolition of the Chinese “License Kingdom” in 1991 (after near economic collapse during an OPEC led effort to drive up the price of oil) temporarily boosts growth to near-Indian levels. With rising power, comes rising military aggressiveness, as Red Indian belligerence to democratic and pluralistic Ceylon increases. Seeking to preserve vital shipping lanes, the USA engages in occasional tit-for-tat symbolic gestures with India, sending in the 7th fleet for “exercises” on occasion from its base in NW Australia. Nuclear-armed CAR’s aggressiveness, supported increasingly by immigrant Indians from the PRI and their descendents, continues to be a flashpoint, with occasional artillery and small arms skirmishes on the high altitude mountains on the southern China border. A participant in a newsgroup in ATL SHWI posts a question: “What if we inverted India and China….?” Subject: Re: AH Challenge: Inverted Countries; China and India Date: 15 Aug 2001 10:16:13 -0700 From: hartjos@iit.edu (Fleetlord Hart) Organization: http://groups.google.com/ Newsgroups: soc.history.what-if References: 1 , 2 Bravo! -Joe Hart "A litle learning is a dangerous thing, drink deep or taste not the Pierian spring. There shallow draughts intoxicate the brain, and drinking largely sobers us again." - Alexander Pope